Jesus and Mo

Irish


Jesus & Mo: Irish

Dread


Jesus & Mo: Dread

Good


Jesus & Mo: Good

Via Jesus & Mo

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
This entry was posted in Blasphemy, Religion. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

11 Comments

  1. Posted January 6, 2010 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    These Jesus and MO images are too funny! Thank you!

  2. Posted January 6, 2010 at 9:19 pm | Permalink

    Wow, this is entirely shit.

    The lineart looks like it’s been done by a ten year old with some sort of palsy and the content is just plain boring.

    Boo-frickin-hoo, “blasphemy” this and “organised religion” that. At least throw in a punchline for Dawkins’ sake.

    If you want to poke fun at the whole blasphemy law and outrageous religious beliefs as a whole, at least do it well. I mean, this is just pathetic.

    Calvin and Hobbes must be turning in their graves.

  3. Posted January 7, 2010 at 4:30 am | Permalink

    I wrote the book “Unmasking The Bible”. Its name says it all!

    In it, I demonstrate that The Bible is not a sacred book, since Yahweh orders ethnical cleansing wars to wipe out all the nations that lived in the Promised Land long before the arrival of the Jews. Like all the local gods of the neighboring countries, Yahweh is a very human god; therefore he is full of anger, hate, revenge and ready to punish who ever disobeys his orders. He only loves his Holy People, the Jewish nation. No one else!

    Jesus, the god of the New Testament, is not recognized by Yahweh, who claims all the worship for himself. Jesus is called the Christ, the Messiah, but both are human titles that the Jews of yore gave to their kings and High Priests, once they were consecrated. I unmask one thousand irregularities that have been (expertly?) hidden for several centuries.

    The book is already on sale at Amazon.com and on Powells.com as a print book. Would it be possible to promote this book among your affiliates?

    How can we work together? We are on the same track!

    Once we demystify The Bible, we will open the door for secularism and tolerance.

    Best regards.

    Leopoldo Hernandez Lara
    leoherla@aol.com

  4. The Man
    Posted January 7, 2010 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    is Mo for Mohammad or Moses? oh wait… first one obviously, the later is exempted by default ’cause we dont want to be labeled as anti-semites, right?
    pathetic.

  5. Posted January 7, 2010 at 7:07 pm | Permalink
  6. keith
    Posted January 8, 2010 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    I’m loving this website.

  7. rcpilot
    Posted January 11, 2010 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    They do have Moses as an occasional third character, it’s normally Jesus and Mohammed though. (Research before you denigrate, please.)

  8. BK
    Posted January 15, 2010 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    What does MO stand for?

    Is it for the Prophet Mohammed?

    Is that a cartoon od the Prophet Mohammed drinking alcohol and a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed in bed with Jesus?

  9. nozzferrahhtoo
    Posted January 15, 2010 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    BK,

    According to wikipedia:

    The simply drawn comic features two present day religious prophets, Jesus and Mo. While Jesus is portrayed as the actual Christian historical figure, Mo claims to be a body double, using casuistry to oppose the restriction of Islam in representing the Islamic prophet Muhammad pictorially.

  10. BK
    Posted January 15, 2010 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    I see. MO is not the prophet and the cartoon is not blasphemous.

    I suppose one should never blaspheme against Islam. ;)

    Interesting site…

  11. An Sionnach
    Posted January 16, 2010 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    The site has good ideas but unfortunately will achieve nothing because you lack the courage of your convictions.
    If you really want to make your point against the blasphemy laws there is absolutely no point in carefully avoiding to offend the modern medievalism epitomised by Islam. Take the Jesus /MO cartoon for example. The fact that it is badly drawn is forgiveable if it was either a) funny or b) really satirical. Using MO rather than Mohammed is just chickenshit, and completely emasculates any impact.
    Targeting Christians nowadays is unlikley to provoke any response. I suggest you post one or two of the Danish cartoons – then sit back and wait for a reaction.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>