<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Atheist Ireland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atheist.ie/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atheist.ie</link>
	<description>Building a rational, ethical and secular society free from superstition and supernaturalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:49:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 25 Blasphemous Quotations by The Dawn Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Partners in blasphemy</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/25-blasphemous-quotations/comment-page-5/#comment-5474</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dawn Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Partners in blasphemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atheist.ie/?p=104#comment-5474</guid>
		<description>[...] opposing the legislation which garnered worldwide attention. They posted 25 written or and uttered quotations which have been categorised as blasphemous under various laws, attributed to figures including Jesus Christ, Prophet Muhammad, Pope Benedict [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opposing the legislation which garnered worldwide attention. They posted 25 written or and uttered quotations which have been categorised as blasphemous under various laws, attributed to figures including Jesus Christ, Prophet Muhammad, Pope Benedict [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 25 Blasphemous Quotations by bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/25-blasphemous-quotations/comment-page-5/#comment-5396</link>
		<dc:creator>bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atheist.ie/?p=104#comment-5396</guid>
		<description>Does everyone feel better now that all the venting is finished? What is the verdict? And absolutely no way for anyone to answer an argument...how convenient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does everyone feel better now that all the venting is finished? What is the verdict? And absolutely no way for anyone to answer an argument&#8230;how convenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 25 Blasphemous Quotations by Fans lose faith in Dawkins - Page 4</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/25-blasphemous-quotations/comment-page-5/#comment-4958</link>
		<dc:creator>Fans lose faith in Dawkins - Page 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atheist.ie/?p=104#comment-4958</guid>
		<description>[...] When I saw this I thought of this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When I saw this I thought of this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catholicism: Is there a place in schools for it? &#8211; by Alice Kinsella by John McMahon</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/catholicism-is-there-a-place-in-schools-for-it-by-alice-kinsella/comment-page-1/#comment-4773</link>
		<dc:creator>John McMahon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheist.ie/?p=407#comment-4773</guid>
		<description>The RC Church controls only the schools which it owns.  The writer is being less than honest in trying to depict the property of the Catholic Church as the property of the State.  When she attended a Catholic school, she was a guest of the RC church and of the RC people of the neighbourhood.  Why did she not behave as a courteous guest should?

Separation of church and state does not call into question the right of Catholics to control the education of their children.  There are Catholic schools in France and in the USA.

The writer is less than honest when she states that the school was maintained by non-denominational taxpayers.  She insinuates that Catholics do not pay tax.
She also seems to be questining the right of Catholic schools to teach Catholicism.  And seems to think that the Catholic church is responsible for there being no non-Catholic schools within easy reach of her home.  Her anti-Catholic rant fails to acknowledge that it is for the parents of children to decide what control (if any) the Catholic, or any other church, shall have over the education of their children.  And she refuses to acknowledge that the Catholic church has a right to preach what it wants to preach about Gays, lesbians or anything else.  From her rant, one could get the impression that Catholic schools are in the habit of sending out snatch squads to grab the children of non-Catholics from the streets and drag them kicking and screaming to be &quot;indoctrinated&quot; in a Catholic school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RC Church controls only the schools which it owns.  The writer is being less than honest in trying to depict the property of the Catholic Church as the property of the State.  When she attended a Catholic school, she was a guest of the RC church and of the RC people of the neighbourhood.  Why did she not behave as a courteous guest should?</p>
<p>Separation of church and state does not call into question the right of Catholics to control the education of their children.  There are Catholic schools in France and in the USA.</p>
<p>The writer is less than honest when she states that the school was maintained by non-denominational taxpayers.  She insinuates that Catholics do not pay tax.<br />
She also seems to be questining the right of Catholic schools to teach Catholicism.  And seems to think that the Catholic church is responsible for there being no non-Catholic schools within easy reach of her home.  Her anti-Catholic rant fails to acknowledge that it is for the parents of children to decide what control (if any) the Catholic, or any other church, shall have over the education of their children.  And she refuses to acknowledge that the Catholic church has a right to preach what it wants to preach about Gays, lesbians or anything else.  From her rant, one could get the impression that Catholic schools are in the habit of sending out snatch squads to grab the children of non-Catholics from the streets and drag them kicking and screaming to be &#8220;indoctrinated&#8221; in a Catholic school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 25 Blasphemous Quotations by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/25-blasphemous-quotations/comment-page-5/#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atheist.ie/?p=104#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>Guys, folks, humanity, we are all trapped in this little oasis and we have nowhere to run, to nowhere to turn. we are actually descendants of pigs and snakes. We behave like so so intolerant. Regardless of our religiosity, so arrogant and hateful. We have ruined our neighbourhood with violence and greed. Hey, you atheists being so smart and intelligent, why can&#039;t you invent a  cure, an inoculation, a jab to cure stupidity, greed. Or why don&#039;t you invent another planet? Whether you believe in God or not we are trapped  in this planet and we have to live with intolerant greedy corrupt silly neighbours. There is no way out by ourselves. Looking at the cosmos we are at the mercy of immense forces which we can only but dimly understand. we are a sorry race!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, folks, humanity, we are all trapped in this little oasis and we have nowhere to run, to nowhere to turn. we are actually descendants of pigs and snakes. We behave like so so intolerant. Regardless of our religiosity, so arrogant and hateful. We have ruined our neighbourhood with violence and greed. Hey, you atheists being so smart and intelligent, why can&#8217;t you invent a  cure, an inoculation, a jab to cure stupidity, greed. Or why don&#8217;t you invent another planet? Whether you believe in God or not we are trapped  in this planet and we have to live with intolerant greedy corrupt silly neighbours. There is no way out by ourselves. Looking at the cosmos we are at the mercy of immense forces which we can only but dimly understand. we are a sorry race!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 25 Blasphemous Quotations by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/25-blasphemous-quotations/comment-page-5/#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atheist.ie/?p=104#comment-4720</guid>
		<description>I am not an athiest but I believe 100% that everyone must be allowed to criticize about anything and that is the Freedom of Expression.  The reason that I am not in control of my own breath which gives me life is the reason why I am not an athiest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not an athiest but I believe 100% that everyone must be allowed to criticize about anything and that is the Freedom of Expression.  The reason that I am not in control of my own breath which gives me life is the reason why I am not an athiest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 25 Blasphemous Quotations by FXR</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/25-blasphemous-quotations/comment-page-5/#comment-4689</link>
		<dc:creator>FXR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atheist.ie/?p=104#comment-4689</guid>
		<description>A list of dead, ficticious or non resident people and one from the minister who wrote the law. That&#039;s hardly courageous. How come the man building his media profile as the great anti blasphemy campaigner forgot to make a blaspemous statement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A list of dead, ficticious or non resident people and one from the minister who wrote the law. That&#8217;s hardly courageous. How come the man building his media profile as the great anti blasphemy campaigner forgot to make a blaspemous statement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visit the blasphemy exhibition in the Oonagh Young Gallery by FXR</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/02/visit-the-blasphemy-exhibition-in-dublin/comment-page-1/#comment-4685</link>
		<dc:creator>FXR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheist.ie/?p=458#comment-4685</guid>
		<description>It’s not much of an exhibition. Like the whole blasphemy campaign it’s more of a hobby horse for faux protesters like Michael Nugent to get a lick of the limelight right alongside the good and the great. If the blasphemy law was designed to divert any possible reaction from atheists to the Ryan and Murphy reports it worked a treat. 

Dermot Ahearn and the Papal nuncio are probably embarrassed at the way they overestimated how Irish heretics might seize on the opportunity to damage the Catholic Church when it was at its weakest point. Now the blasphemy law, so beloved of certain fashionably educated activist types, will lay gathering dust until such time they decide to use it a false concession in the future.

If it was designed as bait to provide a distraction it certainly got swallowed hook line and sinker. That’s what happens when an organisation is led by a self promoter whose main aim is to get a share of the limelight and bask in the reflected glory of associating with visiting stalwarts of the worldwide atheist movement. 

No one asked questions. 

Atheist Ireland along with the gutless artists community have been careful not to go raising a stink about the rape and torture of children and the countless broken victims still waiting for some sort of justice. That just doesn’t go down too well when you’re planning a career as the “atheist” dinner guest in polite society. You don’t want to come across as the mad protester. How courageous to challenge a law by posting blasphemous statements from other people many of them dead, not in the country or even fictitious.

I’m sorry to see the nasty government just refuses to arrest anyone for blasphemy. After going to all the trouble of pasting other people’s words all over a website the sneaky mandarins in Dáil Éireann just won’t take the bait. Why oh why are they not applying to the US government to have Mark Twain’s body exhumed and extradited to face charges here in Ireland. He&#039;d be a really high profile target.

Hey I have a great idea for anyone who really wants to test the blasphemy law: Head down the the Mosque on the North Circular Road dressed as Mohammed and hand out leaflets of the Danish Cartoons. 

That ought to do the trick. 

Or dress up as the Virgin Mary with a new boob job and keep flashing Catholics as they leave Mass. You could have a sign offering safe sex because you’ll still be a virgin after.


Cowardly hypocrisy: it’s Ireland’s number one product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not much of an exhibition. Like the whole blasphemy campaign it’s more of a hobby horse for faux protesters like Michael Nugent to get a lick of the limelight right alongside the good and the great. If the blasphemy law was designed to divert any possible reaction from atheists to the Ryan and Murphy reports it worked a treat. </p>
<p>Dermot Ahearn and the Papal nuncio are probably embarrassed at the way they overestimated how Irish heretics might seize on the opportunity to damage the Catholic Church when it was at its weakest point. Now the blasphemy law, so beloved of certain fashionably educated activist types, will lay gathering dust until such time they decide to use it a false concession in the future.</p>
<p>If it was designed as bait to provide a distraction it certainly got swallowed hook line and sinker. That’s what happens when an organisation is led by a self promoter whose main aim is to get a share of the limelight and bask in the reflected glory of associating with visiting stalwarts of the worldwide atheist movement. </p>
<p>No one asked questions. </p>
<p>Atheist Ireland along with the gutless artists community have been careful not to go raising a stink about the rape and torture of children and the countless broken victims still waiting for some sort of justice. That just doesn’t go down too well when you’re planning a career as the “atheist” dinner guest in polite society. You don’t want to come across as the mad protester. How courageous to challenge a law by posting blasphemous statements from other people many of them dead, not in the country or even fictitious.</p>
<p>I’m sorry to see the nasty government just refuses to arrest anyone for blasphemy. After going to all the trouble of pasting other people’s words all over a website the sneaky mandarins in Dáil Éireann just won’t take the bait. Why oh why are they not applying to the US government to have Mark Twain’s body exhumed and extradited to face charges here in Ireland. He&#8217;d be a really high profile target.</p>
<p>Hey I have a great idea for anyone who really wants to test the blasphemy law: Head down the the Mosque on the North Circular Road dressed as Mohammed and hand out leaflets of the Danish Cartoons. </p>
<p>That ought to do the trick. </p>
<p>Or dress up as the Virgin Mary with a new boob job and keep flashing Catholics as they leave Mass. You could have a sign offering safe sex because you’ll still be a virgin after.</p>
<p>Cowardly hypocrisy: it’s Ireland’s number one product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 25 Blasphemous Quotations by J. Mahmutovic</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/25-blasphemous-quotations/comment-page-5/#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Mahmutovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.atheist.ie/?p=104#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>I am by no means a devout follower of religion, though I strongly believe there to be some truth to it. I will, however, not discuss in detail how Romans were killing off  Christians, of which many in their arenas for their own twisted pleasure and to appease their polytheistic pantheon, for quite some time before deciding that they needed to stop... nor will go in depth ob how that same Roman elite founded the Vatican to keep themselves in power, even if Jesus Christ, peace be upon him, hath  never set foot in Rome. Ofcourse this was just a plot to keep the power focused on Rome. Reality is not without a sense of irony, because those who refused to let the old ways go were now in power and are responsible for much of the apathy which the Vatican has earned over the centuries. I would like to propose a similar scenario to all the Abrahamic religions. Have you ever heard of the Lucis Trust? Used to be known as the Lucifer trust, no less, and is one of those official partners of the United Nations. Hey! Perhaps they&#039;re just atheists or something, don&#039;t look at me, &lt;b&gt;look it up&lt;/b&gt; Well now, I for one fear that this anti-blasphemy law is going to be used falsely in a time when the Muslims are targetted a lot for this other upcoming event. Yes, this Lucifer Trust thing, you must check it out, because soon a new age of spirituality is upon us which will unite all the religions. If you&#039;ve seen Lord of the Rings then the phrase &quot;one ring to rule them all&quot; hits the spot. The sun is coming back. Yes the sun. Surely you educated people hae heard of him. Why he is also on the American dollar bill.. his eye radiates oh so sinistrally from above that pyramid, which could (more like SHOULD) make you wonder what a pyramid is doing on an American bill. Well, that would be the &quot;All-Seeing Eye&quot; or &quot;the Eye of Horus&quot;. Should you not yet know: Horus is a &quot;deity&quot; in the Egyptian pantheon, he is associated with the sun and has but one eye. Odin, all-father of the Norse pantheon, is strangely depicted as having one-eye also. Ah yes, polytheism again... where have we heard that before? Indeed, the Romans. Yes, those good old Romans who kept their power centralized in Rome. They never really became Gods chosen, wouldn&#039;t you say? I mean all those other Christian religions were more or less the result of Roman dictatorship. Mannnn.. Nero Caesar sure tried hard to slaughter all those misguided monotheists. Oh yeah, the white House is kind of like a Roman structure. They could have just as well built a pyramid instead, well apart from that eye ofcourse, we&#039;re waiting for the eye. And why do the royal European families (along with the extremely rich families of ourd world) enbalm themselves like the the pharaohs of old when they claim to be Christians? Wasn&#039;t there a mention of an one-eyed entity in monotheistic religions somewhere? What could it all mean? Surely there is a rational explanation for all this and who better than you people to give it to me. For what it&#039;s worth, I understand that your action is a good way to bring attention to your cause, but why not put a little explanation to ratify the quotations even if it&#039;s for the sake of being, well I don&#039;t know.. you people fancy yourselves civilized, right? Perhaps even more so than the next non-Atheist? In any case, I do want to wish you luck, not for the sake of being able to insult others who you perhaps deem lower, but more so whom you look upon superiorly, basking in your, what should I call it? Emancipation? haha :) Yea, but from what I&#039;ve just tried to epxlain briefly. Should all this not make sense to you then it is even more suggested that you start studying the world. A good place to start would be: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces I mean, if he is not a humanist then I don&#039;t know who is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am by no means a devout follower of religion, though I strongly believe there to be some truth to it. I will, however, not discuss in detail how Romans were killing off  Christians, of which many in their arenas for their own twisted pleasure and to appease their polytheistic pantheon, for quite some time before deciding that they needed to stop&#8230; nor will go in depth ob how that same Roman elite founded the Vatican to keep themselves in power, even if Jesus Christ, peace be upon him, hath  never set foot in Rome. Ofcourse this was just a plot to keep the power focused on Rome. Reality is not without a sense of irony, because those who refused to let the old ways go were now in power and are responsible for much of the apathy which the Vatican has earned over the centuries. I would like to propose a similar scenario to all the Abrahamic religions. Have you ever heard of the Lucis Trust? Used to be known as the Lucifer trust, no less, and is one of those official partners of the United Nations. Hey! Perhaps they&#8217;re just atheists or something, don&#8217;t look at me, <b>look it up</b> Well now, I for one fear that this anti-blasphemy law is going to be used falsely in a time when the Muslims are targetted a lot for this other upcoming event. Yes, this Lucifer Trust thing, you must check it out, because soon a new age of spirituality is upon us which will unite all the religions. If you&#8217;ve seen Lord of the Rings then the phrase &#8220;one ring to rule them all&#8221; hits the spot. The sun is coming back. Yes the sun. Surely you educated people hae heard of him. Why he is also on the American dollar bill.. his eye radiates oh so sinistrally from above that pyramid, which could (more like SHOULD) make you wonder what a pyramid is doing on an American bill. Well, that would be the &#8220;All-Seeing Eye&#8221; or &#8220;the Eye of Horus&#8221;. Should you not yet know: Horus is a &#8220;deity&#8221; in the Egyptian pantheon, he is associated with the sun and has but one eye. Odin, all-father of the Norse pantheon, is strangely depicted as having one-eye also. Ah yes, polytheism again&#8230; where have we heard that before? Indeed, the Romans. Yes, those good old Romans who kept their power centralized in Rome. They never really became Gods chosen, wouldn&#8217;t you say? I mean all those other Christian religions were more or less the result of Roman dictatorship. Mannnn.. Nero Caesar sure tried hard to slaughter all those misguided monotheists. Oh yeah, the white House is kind of like a Roman structure. They could have just as well built a pyramid instead, well apart from that eye ofcourse, we&#8217;re waiting for the eye. And why do the royal European families (along with the extremely rich families of ourd world) enbalm themselves like the the pharaohs of old when they claim to be Christians? Wasn&#8217;t there a mention of an one-eyed entity in monotheistic religions somewhere? What could it all mean? Surely there is a rational explanation for all this and who better than you people to give it to me. For what it&#8217;s worth, I understand that your action is a good way to bring attention to your cause, but why not put a little explanation to ratify the quotations even if it&#8217;s for the sake of being, well I don&#8217;t know.. you people fancy yourselves civilized, right? Perhaps even more so than the next non-Atheist? In any case, I do want to wish you luck, not for the sake of being able to insult others who you perhaps deem lower, but more so whom you look upon superiorly, basking in your, what should I call it? Emancipation? haha <img src='http://www.atheist.ie/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Yea, but from what I&#8217;ve just tried to epxlain briefly. Should all this not make sense to you then it is even more suggested that you start studying the world. A good place to start would be: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces</a> I mean, if he is not a humanist then I don&#8217;t know who is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BLASPHEMY: Oonagh Young Gallery Exhibition Launch on Friday by Also in the news &#171; What Does This Rope Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.atheist.ie/2010/01/oonagh-young-gallery-exhibition/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Also in the news &#171; What Does This Rope Do?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheist.ie/?p=416#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>[...] The Blasphemy Exhibition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Blasphemy Exhibition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
