I think you are making a categorical error if you believe Michael avoids discussion with you because he fears having his ‘folly exposed.’ That’s highly unlikely for two reasons:royalosiodhachain wrote:My opening volley is an invitation to the Superstitious Fool to debate me here where he cannot delete me should he feel that I expose his folly.
1). Michael G is an intelligent person who understands and follows the commonly observed principles and processes of debate.
2). You are not.
He will continue to ignore you, because the alternative involves suffering a seemingly bottomless pit of non-sequiturs, logical fallacies, gross assumptions, base prejudices, intentional obstructionism and outright lies.
It’s not your views that people have a problem with, it’s the dishonest, disrespectful and mindless trollery you employ to present them.
Until you make the apologies you know need to be made, withdraw the false accusations you are currently making, come clean about your own identity, start using the quote function in a more respectful fashion, and begin observing norms of honesty, common decency, courtesy and constructive debate, I'll be ignoring you too.
I
, I no longer moderate) because I decided that his posts added nothing but were in fact obstructing discussions. I will gladly respond either here or in 
